Review



antibody against rab7 #9367  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc antibody against rab7 #9367
    (A-D) Confocal images of HeLa cells treated with 0.02% vehicle (DMSO), 240 nM apilimod, or 1 µM YM-201636 for 2 h followed by Proximity Ligation Assay between protrudin and VapA (A), or <t>Rab7</t> and VapA (B), or Rab7 and protrudin (C), or Rab7 and Kinesin-1 (KIF5B; D). Images were generated by maximum projection of z-stacks of the PLA signal (magenta); DAPI-stained nucleus is shown in gray. Negative controls where one of the primary antibodies was missing are shown. Scale bar = 15 µm. (E-H) Quantification of the number of PLA dots per cell for each protein pair tested in A-D, as indicated in image. All experiments were repeated four independent times with matching independent experiments colour coded. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using an Ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and p values are shown.
    Antibody Against Rab7 #9367, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/antibody against rab7 #9367/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibody against rab7 #9367 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "PIKfyve governs endoplasmic reticulum-lysosome contacts to modulate endoplasmic reticulum dynamics"

    Article Title: PIKfyve governs endoplasmic reticulum-lysosome contacts to modulate endoplasmic reticulum dynamics

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.1101/2025.07.15.664974

    (A-D) Confocal images of HeLa cells treated with 0.02% vehicle (DMSO), 240 nM apilimod, or 1 µM YM-201636 for 2 h followed by Proximity Ligation Assay between protrudin and VapA (A), or Rab7 and VapA (B), or Rab7 and protrudin (C), or Rab7 and Kinesin-1 (KIF5B; D). Images were generated by maximum projection of z-stacks of the PLA signal (magenta); DAPI-stained nucleus is shown in gray. Negative controls where one of the primary antibodies was missing are shown. Scale bar = 15 µm. (E-H) Quantification of the number of PLA dots per cell for each protein pair tested in A-D, as indicated in image. All experiments were repeated four independent times with matching independent experiments colour coded. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using an Ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and p values are shown.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (A-D) Confocal images of HeLa cells treated with 0.02% vehicle (DMSO), 240 nM apilimod, or 1 µM YM-201636 for 2 h followed by Proximity Ligation Assay between protrudin and VapA (A), or Rab7 and VapA (B), or Rab7 and protrudin (C), or Rab7 and Kinesin-1 (KIF5B; D). Images were generated by maximum projection of z-stacks of the PLA signal (magenta); DAPI-stained nucleus is shown in gray. Negative controls where one of the primary antibodies was missing are shown. Scale bar = 15 µm. (E-H) Quantification of the number of PLA dots per cell for each protein pair tested in A-D, as indicated in image. All experiments were repeated four independent times with matching independent experiments colour coded. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using an Ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and p values are shown.

    Techniques Used: Proximity Ligation Assay, Generated, Staining

    (A) Confocal images of HeLa cells co-transfected with non-targeting siRNA control or siRNA oligonucleotides against protrudin, and protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP (gray). Cells were labeled with Dextran, Alexa 546 (magenta) and then exposed to either 0.02% vehicle (DMSO) or 240 nM apilimod for 2 h. Scale bar: full size = 20 µm, zoom insert = 5 µm. (B-D) Quantitative analysis of ER morphology based on protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP fluorescence in conditions shown in A: number of protrudin branches per cell (B), junctions per cell (C), and average branch length (D). (E, F) Quantification of number of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin (E) and Rab7 and VapA (F) in control silenced and protrudin-silenced cells with and without apilimod. (G, H) Quantification of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin (G) and Rab7-VapA (H) in cells treated with vehicle, apilimod, or Vps34-IN to abate PtdIns(3)P levels. (I) Quantification of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin in mock-silenced or protrudin-silenced cells expressing protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP exposed to either vehicle or apilimod. All experiments were repeated three independent times and colour-code matched. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data for (B-F) and (I) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test; Data for (G-H) were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. P values are shown.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Confocal images of HeLa cells co-transfected with non-targeting siRNA control or siRNA oligonucleotides against protrudin, and protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP (gray). Cells were labeled with Dextran, Alexa 546 (magenta) and then exposed to either 0.02% vehicle (DMSO) or 240 nM apilimod for 2 h. Scale bar: full size = 20 µm, zoom insert = 5 µm. (B-D) Quantitative analysis of ER morphology based on protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP fluorescence in conditions shown in A: number of protrudin branches per cell (B), junctions per cell (C), and average branch length (D). (E, F) Quantification of number of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin (E) and Rab7 and VapA (F) in control silenced and protrudin-silenced cells with and without apilimod. (G, H) Quantification of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin (G) and Rab7-VapA (H) in cells treated with vehicle, apilimod, or Vps34-IN to abate PtdIns(3)P levels. (I) Quantification of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin in mock-silenced or protrudin-silenced cells expressing protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP exposed to either vehicle or apilimod. All experiments were repeated three independent times and colour-code matched. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data for (B-F) and (I) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test; Data for (G-H) were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. P values are shown.

    Techniques Used: Transfection, Control, Labeling, Fluorescence, Expressing, Comparison



    Similar Products

    90
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc antibody against rab7 #9367
    (A-D) Confocal images of HeLa cells treated with 0.02% vehicle (DMSO), 240 nM apilimod, or 1 µM YM-201636 for 2 h followed by Proximity Ligation Assay between protrudin and VapA (A), or <t>Rab7</t> and VapA (B), or Rab7 and protrudin (C), or Rab7 and Kinesin-1 (KIF5B; D). Images were generated by maximum projection of z-stacks of the PLA signal (magenta); DAPI-stained nucleus is shown in gray. Negative controls where one of the primary antibodies was missing are shown. Scale bar = 15 µm. (E-H) Quantification of the number of PLA dots per cell for each protein pair tested in A-D, as indicated in image. All experiments were repeated four independent times with matching independent experiments colour coded. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using an Ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and p values are shown.
    Antibody Against Rab7 #9367, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/antibody against rab7 #9367/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibody against rab7 #9367 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit monoclonal (d9f52) antibody against rab7 #9367
    (A-D) Confocal images of HeLa cells treated with 0.02% vehicle (DMSO), 240 nM apilimod, or 1 µM YM-201636 for 2 h followed by Proximity Ligation Assay between protrudin and VapA (A), or <t>Rab7</t> and VapA (B), or Rab7 and protrudin (C), or Rab7 and Kinesin-1 (KIF5B; D). Images were generated by maximum projection of z-stacks of the PLA signal (magenta); DAPI-stained nucleus is shown in gray. Negative controls where one of the primary antibodies was missing are shown. Scale bar = 15 µm. (E-H) Quantification of the number of PLA dots per cell for each protein pair tested in A-D, as indicated in image. All experiments were repeated four independent times with matching independent experiments colour coded. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using an Ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and p values are shown.
    Rabbit Monoclonal (D9f52) Antibody Against Rab7 #9367, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit monoclonal (d9f52) antibody against rab7 #9367/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit monoclonal (d9f52) antibody against rab7 #9367 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rab7
    (A-D) Confocal images of HeLa cells treated with 0.02% vehicle (DMSO), 240 nM apilimod, or 1 µM YM-201636 for 2 h followed by Proximity Ligation Assay between protrudin and VapA (A), or <t>Rab7</t> and VapA (B), or Rab7 and protrudin (C), or Rab7 and Kinesin-1 (KIF5B; D). Images were generated by maximum projection of z-stacks of the PLA signal (magenta); DAPI-stained nucleus is shown in gray. Negative controls where one of the primary antibodies was missing are shown. Scale bar = 15 µm. (E-H) Quantification of the number of PLA dots per cell for each protein pair tested in A-D, as indicated in image. All experiments were repeated four independent times with matching independent experiments colour coded. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using an Ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and p values are shown.
    Rab7, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rab7/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rab7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc 9367s lamp1 cst
    (A-D) Confocal images of HeLa cells treated with 0.02% vehicle (DMSO), 240 nM apilimod, or 1 µM YM-201636 for 2 h followed by Proximity Ligation Assay between protrudin and VapA (A), or <t>Rab7</t> and VapA (B), or Rab7 and protrudin (C), or Rab7 and Kinesin-1 (KIF5B; D). Images were generated by maximum projection of z-stacks of the PLA signal (magenta); DAPI-stained nucleus is shown in gray. Negative controls where one of the primary antibodies was missing are shown. Scale bar = 15 µm. (E-H) Quantification of the number of PLA dots per cell for each protein pair tested in A-D, as indicated in image. All experiments were repeated four independent times with matching independent experiments colour coded. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using an Ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and p values are shown.
    9367s Lamp1 Cst, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/9367s lamp1 cst/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    9367s lamp1 cst - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti rab7 antibody cell signaling 9367t
    (A-D) Confocal images of HeLa cells treated with 0.02% vehicle (DMSO), 240 nM apilimod, or 1 µM YM-201636 for 2 h followed by Proximity Ligation Assay between protrudin and VapA (A), or <t>Rab7</t> and VapA (B), or Rab7 and protrudin (C), or Rab7 and Kinesin-1 (KIF5B; D). Images were generated by maximum projection of z-stacks of the PLA signal (magenta); DAPI-stained nucleus is shown in gray. Negative controls where one of the primary antibodies was missing are shown. Scale bar = 15 µm. (E-H) Quantification of the number of PLA dots per cell for each protein pair tested in A-D, as indicated in image. All experiments were repeated four independent times with matching independent experiments colour coded. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using an Ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and p values are shown.
    Anti Rab7 Antibody Cell Signaling 9367t, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti rab7 antibody cell signaling 9367t/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti rab7 antibody cell signaling 9367t - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc primary antibodies rab7 9367
    (A-D) Confocal images of HeLa cells treated with 0.02% vehicle (DMSO), 240 nM apilimod, or 1 µM YM-201636 for 2 h followed by Proximity Ligation Assay between protrudin and VapA (A), or <t>Rab7</t> and VapA (B), or Rab7 and protrudin (C), or Rab7 and Kinesin-1 (KIF5B; D). Images were generated by maximum projection of z-stacks of the PLA signal (magenta); DAPI-stained nucleus is shown in gray. Negative controls where one of the primary antibodies was missing are shown. Scale bar = 15 µm. (E-H) Quantification of the number of PLA dots per cell for each protein pair tested in A-D, as indicated in image. All experiments were repeated four independent times with matching independent experiments colour coded. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using an Ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and p values are shown.
    Primary Antibodies Rab7 9367, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/primary antibodies rab7 9367/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary antibodies rab7 9367 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti rab7
    (A-D) Confocal images of HeLa cells treated with 0.02% vehicle (DMSO), 240 nM apilimod, or 1 µM YM-201636 for 2 h followed by Proximity Ligation Assay between protrudin and VapA (A), or <t>Rab7</t> and VapA (B), or Rab7 and protrudin (C), or Rab7 and Kinesin-1 (KIF5B; D). Images were generated by maximum projection of z-stacks of the PLA signal (magenta); DAPI-stained nucleus is shown in gray. Negative controls where one of the primary antibodies was missing are shown. Scale bar = 15 µm. (E-H) Quantification of the number of PLA dots per cell for each protein pair tested in A-D, as indicated in image. All experiments were repeated four independent times with matching independent experiments colour coded. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using an Ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and p values are shown.
    Rabbit Anti Rab7, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti rab7/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti rab7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti rab7
    (A-D) Confocal images of HeLa cells treated with 0.02% vehicle (DMSO), 240 nM apilimod, or 1 µM YM-201636 for 2 h followed by Proximity Ligation Assay between protrudin and VapA (A), or <t>Rab7</t> and VapA (B), or Rab7 and protrudin (C), or Rab7 and Kinesin-1 (KIF5B; D). Images were generated by maximum projection of z-stacks of the PLA signal (magenta); DAPI-stained nucleus is shown in gray. Negative controls where one of the primary antibodies was missing are shown. Scale bar = 15 µm. (E-H) Quantification of the number of PLA dots per cell for each protein pair tested in A-D, as indicated in image. All experiments were repeated four independent times with matching independent experiments colour coded. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using an Ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and p values are shown.
    Anti Rab7, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti rab7/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti rab7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A-D) Confocal images of HeLa cells treated with 0.02% vehicle (DMSO), 240 nM apilimod, or 1 µM YM-201636 for 2 h followed by Proximity Ligation Assay between protrudin and VapA (A), or Rab7 and VapA (B), or Rab7 and protrudin (C), or Rab7 and Kinesin-1 (KIF5B; D). Images were generated by maximum projection of z-stacks of the PLA signal (magenta); DAPI-stained nucleus is shown in gray. Negative controls where one of the primary antibodies was missing are shown. Scale bar = 15 µm. (E-H) Quantification of the number of PLA dots per cell for each protein pair tested in A-D, as indicated in image. All experiments were repeated four independent times with matching independent experiments colour coded. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using an Ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and p values are shown.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: PIKfyve governs endoplasmic reticulum-lysosome contacts to modulate endoplasmic reticulum dynamics

    doi: 10.1101/2025.07.15.664974

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A-D) Confocal images of HeLa cells treated with 0.02% vehicle (DMSO), 240 nM apilimod, or 1 µM YM-201636 for 2 h followed by Proximity Ligation Assay between protrudin and VapA (A), or Rab7 and VapA (B), or Rab7 and protrudin (C), or Rab7 and Kinesin-1 (KIF5B; D). Images were generated by maximum projection of z-stacks of the PLA signal (magenta); DAPI-stained nucleus is shown in gray. Negative controls where one of the primary antibodies was missing are shown. Scale bar = 15 µm. (E-H) Quantification of the number of PLA dots per cell for each protein pair tested in A-D, as indicated in image. All experiments were repeated four independent times with matching independent experiments colour coded. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using an Ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and p values are shown.

    Article Snippet: Cells were then subjected to mouse monoclonal (DM1A) antibody against Ill-tubulin (1:100; #T9026; Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit monoclonal (D9F52) antibody against Rab7 (1:100; #9367), mouse monoclonal (E9O7E) antibody against Rab7 (1:100; #95746), mouse monoclonal (D4O1S) antibody against LAMP1 (1:100; #15665) and rabbit monoclonal (D2D11) antibody against LAMP1 (1:200; #9091; all from Cell Signaling Technology).

    Techniques: Proximity Ligation Assay, Generated, Staining

    (A) Confocal images of HeLa cells co-transfected with non-targeting siRNA control or siRNA oligonucleotides against protrudin, and protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP (gray). Cells were labeled with Dextran, Alexa 546 (magenta) and then exposed to either 0.02% vehicle (DMSO) or 240 nM apilimod for 2 h. Scale bar: full size = 20 µm, zoom insert = 5 µm. (B-D) Quantitative analysis of ER morphology based on protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP fluorescence in conditions shown in A: number of protrudin branches per cell (B), junctions per cell (C), and average branch length (D). (E, F) Quantification of number of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin (E) and Rab7 and VapA (F) in control silenced and protrudin-silenced cells with and without apilimod. (G, H) Quantification of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin (G) and Rab7-VapA (H) in cells treated with vehicle, apilimod, or Vps34-IN to abate PtdIns(3)P levels. (I) Quantification of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin in mock-silenced or protrudin-silenced cells expressing protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP exposed to either vehicle or apilimod. All experiments were repeated three independent times and colour-code matched. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data for (B-F) and (I) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test; Data for (G-H) were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. P values are shown.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: PIKfyve governs endoplasmic reticulum-lysosome contacts to modulate endoplasmic reticulum dynamics

    doi: 10.1101/2025.07.15.664974

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Confocal images of HeLa cells co-transfected with non-targeting siRNA control or siRNA oligonucleotides against protrudin, and protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP (gray). Cells were labeled with Dextran, Alexa 546 (magenta) and then exposed to either 0.02% vehicle (DMSO) or 240 nM apilimod for 2 h. Scale bar: full size = 20 µm, zoom insert = 5 µm. (B-D) Quantitative analysis of ER morphology based on protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP fluorescence in conditions shown in A: number of protrudin branches per cell (B), junctions per cell (C), and average branch length (D). (E, F) Quantification of number of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin (E) and Rab7 and VapA (F) in control silenced and protrudin-silenced cells with and without apilimod. (G, H) Quantification of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin (G) and Rab7-VapA (H) in cells treated with vehicle, apilimod, or Vps34-IN to abate PtdIns(3)P levels. (I) Quantification of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin in mock-silenced or protrudin-silenced cells expressing protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP exposed to either vehicle or apilimod. All experiments were repeated three independent times and colour-code matched. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data for (B-F) and (I) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test; Data for (G-H) were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. P values are shown.

    Article Snippet: Cells were then subjected to mouse monoclonal (DM1A) antibody against Ill-tubulin (1:100; #T9026; Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit monoclonal (D9F52) antibody against Rab7 (1:100; #9367), mouse monoclonal (E9O7E) antibody against Rab7 (1:100; #95746), mouse monoclonal (D4O1S) antibody against LAMP1 (1:100; #15665) and rabbit monoclonal (D2D11) antibody against LAMP1 (1:200; #9091; all from Cell Signaling Technology).

    Techniques: Transfection, Control, Labeling, Fluorescence, Expressing, Comparison

    (A-D) Confocal images of HeLa cells treated with 0.02% vehicle (DMSO), 240 nM apilimod, or 1 µM YM-201636 for 2 h followed by Proximity Ligation Assay between protrudin and VapA (A), or Rab7 and VapA (B), or Rab7 and protrudin (C), or Rab7 and Kinesin-1 (KIF5B; D). Images were generated by maximum projection of z-stacks of the PLA signal (magenta); DAPI-stained nucleus is shown in gray. Negative controls where one of the primary antibodies was missing are shown. Scale bar = 15 µm. (E-H) Quantification of the number of PLA dots per cell for each protein pair tested in A-D, as indicated in image. All experiments were repeated four independent times with matching independent experiments colour coded. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using an Ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and p values are shown.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: PIKfyve governs endoplasmic reticulum-lysosome contacts to modulate endoplasmic reticulum dynamics

    doi: 10.1101/2025.07.15.664974

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A-D) Confocal images of HeLa cells treated with 0.02% vehicle (DMSO), 240 nM apilimod, or 1 µM YM-201636 for 2 h followed by Proximity Ligation Assay between protrudin and VapA (A), or Rab7 and VapA (B), or Rab7 and protrudin (C), or Rab7 and Kinesin-1 (KIF5B; D). Images were generated by maximum projection of z-stacks of the PLA signal (magenta); DAPI-stained nucleus is shown in gray. Negative controls where one of the primary antibodies was missing are shown. Scale bar = 15 µm. (E-H) Quantification of the number of PLA dots per cell for each protein pair tested in A-D, as indicated in image. All experiments were repeated four independent times with matching independent experiments colour coded. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using an Ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and p values are shown.

    Article Snippet: Cells were co-incubated with one mouse and one rabbit antibody from the following; rabbit monoclonal (D9F52) antibody against Rab7 (1:100; #9367; Cell Signaling Technology), mouse monoclonal (E9O7E) antibody against Rab7 (1:100; #95746; Cell Signaling Technology), mouse monoclonal (4C12) antibody against VAPA (1:100; #293278; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit polyclonal antibody against ZFYVE27 (1:100; 12680-1-AP; Proteintech), rabbit monoclonal (E3H4J) antibody against KIF5B (1:250; #47610; Cell Signaling Technology), followed by incubation with PLA probes.

    Techniques: Proximity Ligation Assay, Generated, Staining

    (A) Confocal images of HeLa cells co-transfected with non-targeting siRNA control or siRNA oligonucleotides against protrudin, and protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP (gray). Cells were labeled with Dextran, Alexa 546 (magenta) and then exposed to either 0.02% vehicle (DMSO) or 240 nM apilimod for 2 h. Scale bar: full size = 20 µm, zoom insert = 5 µm. (B-D) Quantitative analysis of ER morphology based on protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP fluorescence in conditions shown in A: number of protrudin branches per cell (B), junctions per cell (C), and average branch length (D). (E, F) Quantification of number of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin (E) and Rab7 and VapA (F) in control silenced and protrudin-silenced cells with and without apilimod. (G, H) Quantification of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin (G) and Rab7-VapA (H) in cells treated with vehicle, apilimod, or Vps34-IN to abate PtdIns(3)P levels. (I) Quantification of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin in mock-silenced or protrudin-silenced cells expressing protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP exposed to either vehicle or apilimod. All experiments were repeated three independent times and colour-code matched. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data for (B-F) and (I) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test; Data for (G-H) were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. P values are shown.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: PIKfyve governs endoplasmic reticulum-lysosome contacts to modulate endoplasmic reticulum dynamics

    doi: 10.1101/2025.07.15.664974

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Confocal images of HeLa cells co-transfected with non-targeting siRNA control or siRNA oligonucleotides against protrudin, and protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP (gray). Cells were labeled with Dextran, Alexa 546 (magenta) and then exposed to either 0.02% vehicle (DMSO) or 240 nM apilimod for 2 h. Scale bar: full size = 20 µm, zoom insert = 5 µm. (B-D) Quantitative analysis of ER morphology based on protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP fluorescence in conditions shown in A: number of protrudin branches per cell (B), junctions per cell (C), and average branch length (D). (E, F) Quantification of number of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin (E) and Rab7 and VapA (F) in control silenced and protrudin-silenced cells with and without apilimod. (G, H) Quantification of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin (G) and Rab7-VapA (H) in cells treated with vehicle, apilimod, or Vps34-IN to abate PtdIns(3)P levels. (I) Quantification of PLA dots between Rab7 and protrudin in mock-silenced or protrudin-silenced cells expressing protrudin wt -GFP or protrudin FYVE4A -GFP exposed to either vehicle or apilimod. All experiments were repeated three independent times and colour-code matched. Shown is the mean ± SEM. Data for (B-F) and (I) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test; Data for (G-H) were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. P values are shown.

    Article Snippet: Cells were co-incubated with one mouse and one rabbit antibody from the following; rabbit monoclonal (D9F52) antibody against Rab7 (1:100; #9367; Cell Signaling Technology), mouse monoclonal (E9O7E) antibody against Rab7 (1:100; #95746; Cell Signaling Technology), mouse monoclonal (4C12) antibody against VAPA (1:100; #293278; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit polyclonal antibody against ZFYVE27 (1:100; 12680-1-AP; Proteintech), rabbit monoclonal (E3H4J) antibody against KIF5B (1:250; #47610; Cell Signaling Technology), followed by incubation with PLA probes.

    Techniques: Transfection, Control, Labeling, Fluorescence, Expressing, Comparison